Sunday, October 28, 2007

October 28, 2007

Looking for the Common Thread

I'm looking at this August article about the General Motors online campaign customized to match each targeted consumer based upon their Web habits. The three customized versions of the ads may as well be ads for three completely different products.

And I'm thinking about a conversation I had the other evening with Charlotte Beers. (Last week when I was writing about how important math majors may become in our industry, I had forgotten at the moment that Charlotte was indeed a math major. So she would no doubt be as formidable a force in our industry during this century as she was in the last!)

Anyway, I was talking about this whole trend of customization and "having-it-your-way," and Charlotte made the powerful reminder that people are more alike than they are different. There are core emotions that all humans share, and a brand's challenge is to connect with those emotions in an authentic, resonant way.

That's the heart and soul of effective marketing. And anything else is "cutting corners" or wishful thinking that technology could possibly take the place of smart and creative brand positioning.

I wonder if some marketers aren't running the risk of dilluting brands - or not adequately defining them - by their over-concentration on customized communications.

Having customized products is one thing. Starbucks certainly provides an extraordinary array of choices. But, when it comes to marketing and communications, Starbucks is laser focused and consistent in its brand position - to be "the third place" beyond people's homes and offices.

Apple is equally focused in its marketing and communications...and offers, interestingly, a much more limited product choice than its PC competitors. I'm fascinated by that, as it seems to be so contradictory to the individuality of Apple's "think different" customers.

Making a Difference

This morning, there was an author on The Today Show talking about his book on what makes a job miserable. He said there are basically three reasons people find they feel miserable at work. The first is anonymity...no one knows who they are or acknowledges their work. The second is relevance...they don't feel their job is especially relevant. And the third is they don't feel they are making a difference.

Actually, I would say all the first two are both part of the third: making a difference. People want to feel they are making a difference. It is such a basic, vital human need.

One way that companies can help their employees feel they are making a difference is by making a commitment to cause marketing. A recent survey shows that 40 percent of employees wish their company would do more to support a cause. What do they care most about? Health issues (80%), education issues (77%), environmental issues (77%) and economic development issues (77%).

Getting a company involved in cause marketing can boost pride, loyalty, and productivity. But it works best when you can find a way to get the employees involved as well. Don't let it be just a corporate undertaking. Figure a way to enable everyone to be involved, hopefully in ways that fit their individual interests and abilities.

1 Comments:

At 2:53 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Charlotte is exactly right, and it gives a peace-of-mind (particularly for those of us in the field of marketing) that people are more alike than different. There is a method to the madness of marketing. However, I feel that GM may be adding only madness to the method with their new customized ad campaign. When all is said and done, I believe that we, as customers, are motivated mostly by intrinsic forces. We want the "hot-buttons". We are rational creatures, for the most part, and our buying decisions are based on that human characteristic. We want the comfort of knowing that we made a rational decision....to know that we weren't sucked in by some creative marketing campaign. Marketing strategy that speaks to these intrinsic forces certainly resonates with customers in a sincere, meaningful manner much more so than the high-tech customized advertising. Sure, it's pretty creative of GM and the customers will certainly think it's neat to see an advertisement catered to them and them alone; but I share your opinion that this method may be diluting the brands. Advertising technology is getting more and more advanced, and marketing professionals are driven to take advantage of it. However, we all share a primitive limbic system which influences much of our decision making. I don't think that GM's new tactic is speaking to that system in the least bit.

On another note, I have been interested in RawleMurdy for quite some time now. I share the same passion as your organization does and I am fascinated with marketing, particularly your fresh and creative approach to marketing. I am thrilled to learn of some career opportunities currently available with RawleMurdy and hope that we can sit down in the near future to discuss this wonderful opportunity for the both of us. I have forwarded my resume to Michele and West.

-Sam Fuller
(803)517-7317

 

Post a Comment

<< Home